Cassell's New Dictionary of Cookery

From Aberdeen Crullas to Zwiebach — the vast Cassell's dictionary with a recipe for everything, each priced to the penny ('Probable cost, 2s.'), plus the whole science of the 1912 kitchen.

HomeThe Principles of Cookery › Tea-Cakes, Royal

Tea-Cakes, Royal

Take the weight of a large egg in fresh butter. Beat it to a cream, and mix with it four ounces of pounded and sifted loaf sugar, four ounces of best flour, a small pinch of salt, and the grated peel of half a lemon. Beat the egg with a little orange-flower or rose-water, and with this knead the mixture to smooth paste. Roll it out, cut it into small rounds, and bake these upon floured tins in a well-heated oven. Time to bake, fifteen to thirty minutes, according to the size of the cakes. Probable cost, about 6d. for this quantity. Sufficient for one or two persons.

For the Modern Kitchen

A short, rich shortbread-style biscuit built on the old proportional method: butter measured against the weight of the egg. Weigh rather than guess and it comes together in minutes.

A Little History

Cassell's places this among a long run of "tea-cakes," a category that in late-Victorian Britain covered everything from yeasted currant buns to plain biscuits, united only by being eaten at the afternoon tea table rather than at a meal. The "Royal" tag appears often on period recipes and seems to mark a richer or more delicate version of a plain thing rather than any actual royal connection, though the usage is not documented as a formal convention. The flavouring points the same way: orange-flower and rose water were long-established aromatics in English baking, and gave ground as vanilla and commercial essences became cheaper in the nineteenth century. The proportional instruction — butter to the weight of an egg — belongs to that older tradition of measuring against something to hand, though the recipe itself gives its other quantities in ounces.

← Tea-Cakes, Baker's, to ToastTea-Cakes, Yorkshire, Excellent →