Home › The Principles of Cookery › WOODCOCK, ROAST (another way)
WOODCOCK, ROAST (another way)
There is more art in roasting woodcocks than any other bird of the same size. They require constant attention during the operation of roasting them. As they must be cooked very little--the flesh of the woodcock, like that of all dark-fleshed game, being digestible when almost raw, and losing its savour if roasted to the same degree as a partridge--their cooking occupies but little time; therefore the cook should never leave her woodcocks from the moment they are put down until she takes them up. Truss without drawing them, and put toast under them to catch the trail, which often falls from them when they are before the fire. The most delicate parts of the woodcock are the legs and the trail; next, the breast. As this latter must be very much underdone, and the legs a little better done, to be eatable, there is, of course, an inequality in their roasting, which must be obviated by stopping the spit for a time whenever the legs are turned towards the fire, in order to give them a greater proportion of heat. The woodcocks, when done, are served up upon the toast, with melted butter only, as their flavour would be deteriorated by any kind of gravy.
This is a set of instructions for roasting a bird undrawn and deliberately underdone, and it cannot be followed safely or, in many places, legally today. The points below explain the specific problems rather than offering a corrected method.
- The bird is cooked undrawn"Truss without drawing them" means the intestines stay in and are eaten, either smeared on the toast beneath or with the bird. Gut contents are the primary reservoir of Salmonella, Campylobacter and Clostridium in any wild bird, and nothing here brings them to a temperature that would control those organisms.
- Deliberately raw breastThe text is explicit that the breast "must be very much underdone" and that dark-fleshed game is "digestible when almost raw." That belief was about digestion, not microbiology. Poultry and game birds are safe at 74C/165F throughout; this method aims for a good deal less than that and treats the shortfall as the point of the dish.
- Lead shotWild-shot woodcock frequently carries lead pellets and fragments in the flesh. There is no safe intake of lead, and the fragments are too small and too scattered to pick out reliably, which is a separate reason this is not a dish to reconstruct at home.
- Legal statusIn the United States woodcock is a migratory game bird: it may not be bought or sold, and taking it requires a licence within a set season. In Britain and Ireland it remains legal quarry in season and may be sold by game dealers, though it is not a routine butcher's item.
- The equipment assumedThe whole method depends on an open fire and a spit that can be stopped so the legs are turned towards the heat for longer, with dripping toast set underneath. No domestic oven reproduces that differential, which is why the instruction reads as attention rather than time or temperature.
- "The trail"An old game-cookery term for the entrails of woodcock and snipe, prized because these birds were said to void themselves cleanly. That reputation is folklore, not a food-safety finding, and it is the assumption the entire recipe rests on.
- If you want the dishFollow a current recipe from a source that addresses drawing, internal temperature and lead.
Woodcock was the connoisseur's bird of the Victorian game season, judged by how little it had been cooked and how the trail had been handled. The practice of roasting snipe and woodcock undrawn on toast is generally traced to the medieval and early modern kitchen, where small birds were spitted whole and the fat and juices caught on a sippet of bread below; by the nineteenth century it had hardened into a point of table connoisseurship, the toast served under the bird and eaten with it. The anxious tone of the entry -- the cook must not leave the fire for a moment, the spit must be checked whenever the legs come round -- reflects a real technical difficulty of open-hearth roasting, where the only controls available were distance, orientation and constant watching. It also reflects a period confidence that dark game flesh was wholesome nearly raw, an idea drawn from contemporary theories of digestibility rather than from any knowledge of foodborne pathogens.