The Epicurean
A Treatise on the Culinary Art — Charles Ranhofer of Delmonico’s — 1894
No. 2258

Chicken Cutlets a la Clarence

Cotelettes de Poulet a la Clarence

Fry lightly in butter and lemon juice six well-pared chicken fillets cut into half hearts; place them under a weight to press lightly and divide each one into halves through the thickest part and trim neatly again. Bone the legs, suppress the nerves and fat and fry them in butter, then allow to cool; pound these with the same quantity of foies-gras from a terrine, adding about six egg-yolks and proper seasoning; pass this through a sieve and then mix in four tablespoonfuls of chopped truffles, a little melted glaze (No. 402) and a dash of cayenne and nutmeg. With this preparation cover both surfaces of each fillet, range them on a lightly buttered baking sheet and let get cold on ice; detach them from the sheet, heating it underneath, then roll each separate one in bread-crumbs, dip in beaten egg, roll once more in the crumbs, and smooth the breading with the blade of a knife. Plunge a few chops at a time into hot frying fat to brown nicely, then drain and insert a small favor frill (No. 10). Dress them in a circle on a forcemeat ring poached in a plain border mold (Fig. 139), hollowed on the top; in the center of the ring range minced fresh mushrooms thickened with well-reduced bechamel sauce (No. 409).

For the Modern Kitchen

Ranhofer writes for a brigade with a stockpot always going and cross-references half the book. Here is what the shorthand means and where the dish can go wrong.

A Little History

The Epicurean (1894) is Charles Ranhofer's record of thirty-odd years as chef of Delmonico's in New York, and this is exactly the kind of entrée that made the restaurant's reputation: chicken breast disguised as a chop, sheathed in foie gras and truffle, crumbed, fried and stood in a circle on a poached forcemeat plinth with a paper frill on each. The technique is the classic French côtelette deception, in which cheap or shapeless meat is cut and dressed to imitate a rib chop, and it runs through nineteenth-century service cookery from Carême onward. Names like "à la Clarence" were dedications, usually to a patron or a colleague, and Ranhofer scatters hundreds of them through the book; a separate classical usage attaches Clarence to curry-flavored dishes, generally traced to the ducal title, but nothing in this preparation suggests curry, so the name here is most likely a house tribute whose subject is no longer recoverable.