The Twentieth Century Home Cook Book

Practical recipes and household wisdom from 1906 — when the icebox was high technology and dinner had nine courses.

HomeGame › Woodcock and Snipe

Woodcock and Snipe

Some epicures say that the woodcock should never be drawn, but that they should be fastened to a small bird-spit, and should be put to roast before a clear fire; a slice of toast put in a pan below each bird in order to catch the trail; baste them with melted butter; lay the toast on a hot dish, and the birds on the toast. They require from fifteen to twenty minutes to roast.

Snipe are dressed in the same manner, but require less time to cook.

For the Modern Kitchen

A method rather than a formula: two small game birds roasted whole, undrawn, over toast that collects the drippings. The technique survives almost unchanged in French and British game cookery, and translates to a modern oven without much trouble.

A Little History

Woodcock has held an unreasonable amount of culinary prestige for centuries, largely because it is difficult to shoot, arrives only in migration, and tastes strongly of liver and iron in a way no farmed bird does. The instruction not to draw it appears in English cookery books from at least the seventeenth century onward and rests on the belief that a bird feeding on earthworms carries no foul gut content; French kitchens formalised the same idea with the b case: the b casse roasted sans vider, its trail worked into a paste for the croute. Snipe is the smaller cousin and was treated as a lesser version of the same bird the English word sniper is generally traced to the difficulty of shooting one. The recipe's own hedge, "Some epicures say," shows the compiler passing on a connoisseur's practice rather than vouching for it.

← PloverPheasants →